This parliamentary question inquires whether specific independent environmental reviews regarding the Brush-tailed Phascogale (Wambenger) were provided to relevant state and federal environmental agencies before a key EPA determination and a previous parliamentary answer.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2781Legislative Assembly
Asked
18 June 2026
Portfolio
the Environment; Community Services; Homelessness

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Were the independent desktop peer review and ornithologist site assessment commissioned by the City of Kalamunda provided to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER), the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) (Commonwealth) before the EPA's 26 April 2026 determination or the answer to Question 2302(c) on 6 May 2026? If so, when and to which agencies?
(2) Was the "moderate" risk to the Brush-tailed Phascogale (Wambenger) identified in the City's independent peer review provided to, or considered by, the EPA before its 26 April 2026 determination?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more