❓ This parliamentary question scrutinizes the regulatory approval process for a $40 million refurbishment at The Mount Hospital, particularly concerning the Authorisation to Occupy (ATO) certification and its implications for the hospital's ownership transfer.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2548Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
Can the Minister advise:
(a) When did the Mount Hospital complete the $40m refurbishment as part of a modernisation program agreed with the Health Department;
(b) When did the Licensing Accreditation and Regulatory Unit (LARU) in the Department of Health commence its regulatory process to issue an Authorisation to Occupy (ATO) certification to the hospital;
(c) Has an ATO ben issued to the hospital and if so when;
(d) If the ATO has not been issued, why;
(e) Has the work undertaken by the LARU been considered as part of the Government's decision to underwrite the transfer of ownership of the hospital;
(f) Which party is responsible for addressing the issues raised by the LARU and what is the estimated cost;
(g) Is the Government undertaking a separate examination of the condition of the hospital, if so when and can the report be tabled;
(h) If this report has already been completed can it be tabled, what is the estimated cost of addressing the issues contained in the report and who is responsible for this cost; and
(i) Will the LARU be required to issue an ATO for the Mount Hospital prior to the new arrangements for management of the hospital occur?
Answered on
(a) When did the Mount Hospital complete the $40m refurbishment as part of a modernisation program agreed with the Health Department;
(b) When did the Licensing Accreditation and Regulatory Unit (LARU) in the Department of Health commence its regulatory process to issue an Authorisation to Occupy (ATO) certification to the hospital;
(c) Has an ATO ben issued to the hospital and if so when;
(d) If the ATO has not been issued, why;
(e) Has the work undertaken by the LARU been considered as part of the Government's decision to underwrite the transfer of ownership of the hospital;
(f) Which party is responsible for addressing the issues raised by the LARU and what is the estimated cost;
(g) Is the Government undertaking a separate examination of the condition of the hospital, if so when and can the report be tabled;
(h) If this report has already been completed can it be tabled, what is the estimated cost of addressing the issues contained in the report and who is responsible for this cost; and
(i) Will the LARU be required to issue an ATO for the Mount Hospital prior to the new arrangements for management of the hospital occur?
Answered on
AnswerView source ↗
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.