This parliamentary question scrutinises the modern slavery compliance obligations imposed on producers, particularly wine producers, by the WA Return Recycle Renew Ltd (WARRRL) Supply Agreement, questioning their scope, cost, and alignment with existing legislation.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2604Legislative Assembly
Asked
9 June 2026
Portfolio
the Environment

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Is it correct that clause 8 of the WA Return Recycle Renew Ltd (WARRRL) Supply Agreement requires producers to implement and maintain modern slavery compliance measures?
(2) Is it correct that clause 8 requires producers to provide warranties regarding modern slavery risks within their supply chains?
(3) Is it correct that clause 8 requires producers to impose equivalent obligations on their own suppliers and contractors?
(4) Has the Government undertaken any assessment of the compliance costs associated with these obligations for wine producers:
(a) If yes, on what date was the assessment completed; and
(b) what was the estimated annual compliance cost per producer?
(5) Is it correct that the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) generally applies only to entities with annual consolidated revenue of at least $100 million?
(6) Has the Government assessed whether the obligations imposed under clause 8 exceed those that would otherwise apply to the majority of Western Australian wine producers?
(7) Will the Minister table any assessment, briefing, advice, or analysis relating to the modern slavery obligations contained within the Supply Agreement?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more