A parliamentary question highlights concerns about the safety of children previously substantiated for harm, noting that almost one in ten experience subsequent harm within 12 months, and questions the reasons and government's actions.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2381Legislative Assembly
Asked
9 June 2026
Portfolio
Prevention of Family and Domestic Violence

QuestionView source ↗

The 2026-27 Budget Papers note that indicators relating to children and young people needing protection are safe from abuse and harm show that the estimated actual is below the budget in 2025-26 and below the 2024-24 actual:
(a) Is the Minister aware that the indicator "proportion of children not subject to a subsequent substantiation of harm within 12 months of a previous substantiation of harm" at 91% indicates that almost one in ten children that the department has investigated and known to have been harmed, are found to have been harmed again, leass than a year later;
(b) Why has the safety of these children under the department's watch decreased;
(c) Is this the result of an increased focus on preventing children from entering care; and
(d) What is the Government doing to ensure this key safety indicator immediately improves?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more