This parliamentary question scrutinizes the EPA's determination regarding the Jorgensen Park event, specifically questioning the information available to the EPA and requesting a review of its decision based on new findings.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2779Legislative Assembly
Asked
18 June 2026
Portfolio
the Environment; Community Services; Homelessness

QuestionView source ↗

(1) What information was provided to, or otherwise available to, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) when it determined on 26 April 2026 that the Jorgensen Park event was not a "significant proposal"?
(2) Was the EPA provided with: the conditions of CPS 10801/1 and CPS 11036/1; the Section 91 Licence of 7 April 2026 authorising removal of Banksia sessilis; the proponent's ecological assessments identifying EPBC-listed species; and DWER ICMS records 107299 and 107872?
(3) Did the proponent or local council make a submission to the EPA in relation to the 26 April 2026 referral, and if so, will the Parliamentary Secretary table it?
(4) Will the Parliamentary Secretary ask the EPA to review its 26 April 2026 determination in light of the independently commissioned peer review findings and the matters raised in these questions?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more