❓ Asks the Department of Environment about the effectiveness of invasive vertebrate pest control programs in Perth Hills parks and forests, including evidence of reduced pest activity and predation, mesopredator release, species at risk, ecological changes, and planned strategy changes.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 2059Legislative Assembly
Asked
14 April 2026
Member
Portfolio: the Environment
Question
(1) For each of the following parks, reserves and State forest areas in the Perth Hills, Kalamunda National Park, Gooseberry Hill National Park, Helena National Park, Beelu National Park, Mundy Regional Park, Wooroloo Regional Park, Pickering Brook and surrounding conservation estate (commonly referred to as Korung National Park); and State forest areas within and surrounding Kalamunda, Mundaring, Pickering Brook and Wooroloo, what evidence does the Department have that current invasive vertebrate pest control programs are effective in reducing:(a) pest abundance or activity; and(b) predation pressure on native fauna?(2) Has the Department observed, or assessed the risk of, mesopredator release in any of these areas, including increases in feral cat activity following fox control?(3) What native species or ecological communities within these areas have been identified as being at risk from invasive vertebrate pest species?(4) Has the Department identified any localised native species decline, recovery or ecological change in any of these areas that has been attributed, wholly or partly, to invasive vertebrate pest management?(5) Are there any current or planned changes to invasive vertebrate pest management strategies in these areas?
(1) For each of the following parks, reserves and State forest areas in the Perth Hills, Kalamunda National Park, Gooseberry Hill National Park, Helena National Park, Beelu National Park, Mundy Regional Park, Wooroloo Regional Park, Pickering Brook and surrounding conservation estate (commonly referred to as Korung National Park); and State forest areas within and surrounding Kalamunda, Mundaring, Pickering Brook and Wooroloo, what evidence does the Department have that current invasive vertebrate pest control programs are effective in reducing:
(a) pest abundance or activity; and
(b) predation pressure on native fauna?
(2) Has the Department observed, or assessed the risk of, mesopredator release in any of these areas, including increases in feral cat activity following fox control?
(3) What native species or ecological communities within these areas have been identified as being at risk from invasive vertebrate pest species?
(4) Has the Department identified any localised native species decline, recovery or ecological change in any of these areas that has been attributed, wholly or partly, to invasive vertebrate pest management?
(5) Are there any current or planned changes to invasive vertebrate pest management strategies in these areas?
Answer
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.